just-shower-thoughts:

If you can’t intelligently argue for both sides of an issue, you don’t understand the issue well enough to argue for either

June  25 2231 ♡ Via
  1. factsoverfeels reblogged this from just-shower-thoughts
  2. kimchinight reblogged this from tokyxlights
  3. tokyxlights reblogged this from moomimz
  4. funaristock reblogged this from moomimz
  5. casuallyfadingdaze reblogged this from just-shower-thoughts
  6. akir3rin reblogged this from moomimz
  7. the-blinding-sun reblogged this from just-shower-thoughts
  8. streetspirit-fadeout reblogged this from hawyeegal
  9. mostly-candid reblogged this from andrainbows
  10. gutspet reblogged this from moomimz
  11. unmaskthedemons reblogged this from omg-sweetunlikelycollector-me and added:
    Right.
  12. nerdyfra reblogged this from moomimz
  13. eternallystarlight reblogged this from omg-sweetunlikelycollector-me
  14. batman--n--throbin reblogged this from omg-sweetunlikelycollector-me
  15. omg-sweetunlikelycollector-me reblogged this from gentlemanmusings
  16. cooltrainerzero said: …did you just claim that everything I want is required by the US constitution? Meaning that you are, by definition anti-American?
  17. cooltrainerzero reblogged this from dragon-zahara and added:
    “…you were applying your statement about not being able to intelligently debate complete absurdity and applying it to...
  18. dragon-zahara said: @cooltrainerzero You are a typical left-wing FUCKBOY who demands the government provide you with more free shit and like all of your kind, you want everyone else to pay for it. You forget that most of the social issues you are a champion of would be resolved if the government fulfilled ts role as defined in the U.S. Constitution. People like you guarantee that the President WILL serve another 4 years in office & there is absolutely nothing you can do about it. FUCK OFF
  19. dragon-zahara reblogged this from cooltrainerzero and added:
    I clearly identified what I was referring to in the above text. Again, you were applying your statement about not being...
  20. cooltrainerzero said: Also, you’re the one who keeps trying to get my attention. And also also you really need to look up “semantics.” And just generally learn to read and/or think. Now leave me alone.
  21. cooltrainerzero said: @dragon-zahara But your “point” is that all points can be argued for which means that none can ever be proven. It’s inherently self-contradictory *and obviously so*. Any child with half an ounce of logic can see why.
  22. dragon-zahara said: @cooltrainerzero ★ literally, this was worth reblogging? At least you reposted the points that I made. I have no idea what an argument is? It was what you are doing. You are back to semantics. The point of this was and always has been your failure to understand the principles behind an intelligent debate. You have made this abundantly clear post after post. Now leaving your readers with this last bit of wisdom is icing on the cake. Thanks for proving my point. Take care!
  23. red-nightingale said: @dropslikerain☀nicely done! That guy is way out of his league with this one and between the two of you, he is strategically planning his next move with a ouija board, magic 8 ball, or is intensively scouring the internet for material he can pass of as his own thoughts and/ideas.
  24. dropslikerain reblogged this from dragon-zahara and added:
    Roflmao, job well done. And you make a good point. For someone who’s SO bored with my “debating” despite the fact that...
  25. insertcleverurl reblogged this from just-shower-thoughts
  26. just-shower-thoughts posted this
☯